according to avery weisman, what is the first step required in order to achieve an appropriate death

Win the battle of commonwealth

Do away with private belongings

Abolish the wages system altogether

Finish employment to end unemployment

Attain abundance for all and inscribe on the banners:

From each according to their power, to each according to their needs!

An clan, in which the free evolution of each is the condition of free development of all

"Communism is the riddle of history solved, and it knows itself to exist this solution."
― Karl Marx, Private Property and Communism, 1844

"Empirically, communism is simply possible as the deed of the dominant peoples "all at in one case" and simultaneously, which presupposes the universal development of productive forces and the globe intercourse leap upwards with them… presupposes the globe market . The proletariat can thus merely exist world-historically , just as communism, its activity, tin merely have a "globe-historical" existence. World-historical existence of individuals, i.due east., beingness of individuals which is directly linked up with world history… Communism is for us not a state of affairs, which is to be established, an ideal to which reality [will] have to adjust itself. We call communism the real motion which abolishes the present country of things. The conditions of this movement result from the now existing premise." – Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, The German Ideology (1845-46), Collected Works, Vol. 5, Progress Publishers, Moscow 1976, p. 49

A."COMMUNISMUS, SOCIALISMUS, HUMANISMUS" – Marx & Engels, (ibid, p.458)

"communism or socialism" – Marx & Engels, (ibid., p.468)

Well in 1847 Engels saw "that the communist revolution will not merely be a national phenomenon just must accept place simultaneously in all civilized countries … Information technology is a world-broad revolution and volition therefore exist earth-broad in scope." (Principles of Communism, October, 1847)

Our Business organization

"Our concern cannot just be to modify individual holding, but to abolish it, non to hush up form antagonisms just to abolish classes, non to better the existing society but to establish a new i." – Karl Marx & Frederick Engels, Address of the Central Committee to the Communist League…

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/communist-league/1850-ad1.htm

"The proletarians cannot become masters of the productive forces of society, except by abolishing their own previous mode of cribbing, and thereby as well every other previous fashion of cribbing. … All previous historical movements were movements of minorities, or in the involvement of minorities. The proletarian motion is the cocky-conscious, contained movement of the immense majority, in the interest of the immense majority. … the theory of the Communists may be summed up in a single sentence: Abolition of individual property … of buying and selling… The working men take no country … the proletarians accept nothing to lose but their chains. They accept a world to win. Working men of all countries, unite!" – Marx-Engels, Manifesto of the Communist Party, 1848.

~ "To conquer political power has therefore become the swell duty of the working classes.… the emancipation of the working classes requires their fraternal concurrences" (Marx, 1864, Countdown Address of the Working Men's International Association, Collected Works, Vol. 20, p.12, Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1985)

Emancipation of labour – guiding principle of Marx

"That the emancipation of the working classes must be conquered by the working classes themselves, that the struggle for the emancipation of the working classes ways non a struggle for form privileges and monopolies, but for equal rights and duties, and the abolitionism of all grade rule;" – Provisional Rules of the International Working Men'southward Association, 1864

 "the emancipation of labor is neither a local nor a national, simply a social trouble, embracing all countries in which modern society exists, and depending for its solution on the concurrence, applied and theoretical, of the near advanced countries." – International Working Men's Association 1864, General Rules

"At the same time, and quite apart from the full general servitude involved in the wages organization, the working class ought not to exaggerate to themselves the ultimate working of these everyday struggles. They ought not to forget that they are fighting with effects, but non with the causes of those effects; that they are retarding the downward movement, but non changing its direction; that they are applying palliatives, not curing the malady. They ought, therefore, not to be exclusively absorbed in these unavoidable guerilla fights incessantly springing up from the never ceasing encroachments of capital or changes of the market. They ought to understand that, with all the miseries it imposes upon them, the present arrangement simultaneously engenders the cloth weather and the social forms necessary for an economical reconstruction of guild. Instead of the conservative motto: "A fair 24-hour interval's wage for a fair day's piece of work!" they ought to inscribe on their imprint the revolutionary watchword: "Abolition of the wages system!""[emphasis added] ~ Marx, Value, Price and Profit, CW, Vol. twenty, pp. 148-49; Likewise at:

http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1865/value-price-turn a profit/ch03.htm#c14

Karl Marx and Peaceful Revolution

The post-obit passage from 1878, which emphasizes that such a transition may not stay peaceful, is a skillful example of Marx mentioning the winning of a parliamentary majority:

"An historical development can remain 'peaceful' just so long as no forcible hindrances are put in its way by the existing rulers of a society. If, for instance, in England or the United States, the working class were to win a bulk in Parliament or Congress, it could legally put an stop to laws and institutions continuing in the style of its development, although fifty-fifty here simply so far as societal evolution permitted. For the 'peaceful' movement could yet be turned into a 'violent' one by the revolt of those whose interests were bound up with the old guild. If such people were then put down by forcefulness (as in the American Civil War and the French Revolution), information technology would exist rebels against the 'lawful' ability."

Detect that the function of the parliamentary majority is not to legislate socialism into beingness, but to help clear away obstacles for the working course motility as a whole.

Source: German: http://www.dearchiv.de/php/dok.php?archiv=mew&brett=MEW034&fn=487-500.34&bill of fare=mewinh English translation: https://libcom.org/library/karl-marx-state

~ "Considering,

That against the commonage ability of the propertied classes, the working grade cannot act, as a class, except by constituting itself into a political party, distinct from, and opposed to, all one-time parties formed by the propertied classes. That this constitution of the working class into a political political party is indispensable in gild to ensure the triumph of the social revolution and its ultimate end – the abolition of classes." – Resolution IX, London Briefing of the International, 1871.

1880: Marx on Universal Suffrage and Political Self-organization

"Because

That the emancipation of the productive class is that of all human beings without distinction of sexual activity or race;

That the producers can be complimentary but insofar as they are in possession of the means of product;

That there are only ii forms nether which the means of production can vest to them:

1. The individual form which has never existed generally and which is being more and more eliminated past the procedure of industry;
2. The collective class whose material and intellectual elements are being formed by the very evolution of capitalist society.

Considering

That this collective appropriation tin but exist the outcome of the revolutionary activeness of the productive class – or proletariat – organized in a separate political party.

That such arrangement must exist pursued past all the means, which the proletariat has at its disposal, including universal suffrage, thus transformed from the instrument of trickery, which information technology has been up till now into an instrument of emancipation." [Emphasis added]

Written on about May ten, 1880

Printed according to L'Égalité, No. 24, June thirty, 1880, checked with the text of Le Précurseur

Get-go published in Le Précurseur, No. 15, June 19, 1880

Translated from the French

Engels on Style of Revolution

Frederick Engels cautioned in 1895

"… there could be no dubiety for us, under the circumstances and then obtaining, that the swell decisive battle had commenced, that it would accept to be fought out in a single, long and vicissitudinous period of revolution, but that it could only cease in the final victory of the proletariat….

But history has shown us too to have been wrong, has revealed our point of view at that time as an illusion. Information technology has washed fifty-fifty more than; information technology has not merely dispelled the erroneous notions we and so held; it has also completely transformed the conditions under which the proletariat has to fight. The mode of struggle of 1848 is today obsolete in every respect…

All revolutions up to the present day have resulted in the displacement of the rule of 1 class by the rule of another; but all ruling classes upwardly to now take been only small minorities in relation to the ruled mass of the people. One ruling minority was thus overthrown; another minority seized

the helm of state in its stead and refashioned the land institutions to suit its own interests. …

History has proved us wrong, and all who thought similar u.s.. …

With this successful utilisation of universal suffrage, however, an entirely new method of proletarian struggle came into operation, and this method quickly took on a more tangible form. …

And and then it happened that the bourgeoisie and the authorities came to be much more agape of the legal than of the illegal activeness of the workers' party, of the results of elections than of those of rebellion. …

Rebellion in the former way, street fighting with barricades, which decided the issue everywhere up

to 1848, was to a considerably extent obsolete.

Let united states have no illusions about it: a real victory of insurrection over the armed forces in street fighting,

a victory as betwixt two armies, is i of the rarest exceptions. And the insurgents counted on it just as rarely. … all the conditions of the insurgents' side have grown worse. An insurrection with which all sections of the people sympathise will hardly recur; in the form struggle all the middle strata will never in all probability group themselves around the proletariat so exclusively that in comparing the party of reaction gathered round the bourgeoisie volition well-nearly disappear. The "people", therefore, will always announced divided, and thus a about powerful lever, so extraordinarily effective in 1848, is gone….

Does the reader at present understand why the powers-that-exist positively desire to get usa to go where the guns shoot and the sabres slash? Why they accuse us today of cowardice, because we exercise non take without more than ado to the streets, where we are certain of defeat in advance? Why they so earnestly implore u.s. to play for once the part of cannon fodder? …

Nosotros are non that stupid. … The time of surprise attacks, of revolutions carried through past modest conscious minorities at the caput of masses lacking consciousness is by. Where information technology is a question of a complete transformation of the social organization, the masses themselves must also be in on it, must themselves already have grasped what is at stake, what they are fighting for, torso and soul.

The history of the final fifty years has taught us that. But in guild that the masses may understand what is to be washed, long, persistent work is required, and it is merely this piece of work that nosotros are now pursuing."

• Engels, Introduction to Marx'southward "The Course Struggles in France 1848 to 1850"

(1895), Marx – Engels, Selected Works, Volume One, Progress Publishers, Moscow 1969, pp. 190, 199-200; Likewise See: Works of Frederick Engels 1895 at:  http://world wide web.marxists.org/annal/marx/works/1895/03/06.htm

"For the total representation of labour in Parliament, also as for the preparation of the abolition of the wages system, organizations will become necessary, not of separate Trades, but of the working class as torso. And the sooner this is done the better. …"(Engels, Trades Unions, written on about May 20, 1881, C. W. 24, pp. 386-89)

"Commonwealth nowadays is communism" – Engels, The Festival of Nations in London written at the cease of 1845

Hal Draper: The Death of the Country in Marx and Engels (1970)

www.marxists.org/archive/draper/1970/twenty/state.html

The Death of the Country in Marx and Engels … Saint-Simon [17 Oct 1760 – nineteen May 1825] looked frontward to the replacement of the government of men past the assistants of things.

Elect MPs as mandated socialist delegates to overwhelm the Parliaments and pronounce: Annulment of all holding and territorial rights whereby all that is on and in the earth will become the common heritage of the whole humanity. This volition help articulate away obstacles for the working grade movement equally a whole and usher the humanity into the realm of freedom towards World Socialism.

>> Socialists are non confronting persons, only confronting capitalism.

>> Socialism has never and nowhere been tried at all.

>>  When it volition be washed, it will accept to be established worldwide.

>> World socialism can be established only through a peaceful and autonomous way, by ways of collective understanding, number and rallies of the working form. All the same, if any minority group obstructs initiation of socialism, socialists will have to advance by encountering it. But force does not mean violence. Force or power is built-in out of the union of knowledge based on materialist conception of history and an contained arrangement of the working class. It is number, understanding and solidarity that establish real forcefulness. Only working course is the majority – 95% of the population of the world. It is only the working class who perform all work in capitalism. Therefore their ability is non violent.

>> Winning elections does not weaken the argument for applying strength, rather strengthens information technology. On the other hand, without taking the beginning step of declaring the legal defeat of capitalism through its own constitution, applying forcefulness against an elected government not only becomes futile, just also decimates the truth that it is the class conscious working class who is the majority.

>> To win the battle of republic later on understanding what we are going to do, where the danger lies, what and why socialism has a double advantage: (a) we can bear witness the socialist bulk by sending majority delegates (non merely representatives) to the parliament, and (b) in case there be whatever attempt from whatever corner to cake this mandate by using parliament, we tin abandon the legality of the parliament, This tactics of social change via democratic means is gratis from violence and certain.

>> Arriving at the majority and with it instead of reforming capitalism and running its administration socialists will become ready to its abolition; they will not accept any administrative posts of capitalist order before arriving at the position of its abolition. The job of socialist delegates (MPs) is not to assist run the capitalist governing process, but to incapacitate the process itself, to facilitate the abolition of capitalism by the immense majority of socialists. Because, socialists neither support nor oppose the reforms of capitalism. Their only and immediate aim is to establish socialism.

>> Without informed majority participation in order to reach at a democratic decision in the interest of all the conception of vote and democracy is meaningless. We need participatory commonwealth.

>>  Socialists practice non trust political leaders, since the beingness of leaders means the existence of followers and both remaining drowned in political ignorance. Leader/follower relation is anti-democratic. Organization and leadership are not the same thing; there tin can be system without leadership. Leadership is not necessary when an system is democratic. The immense majority of people of society can create socialism consciously in their own interest and with their own initiative.

>>  A socialist political party does non require a leader, socialists are all equals.

>>  The Globe Socialist Party (India) has organization, merely no leadership. This organization is carrying on political class struggle every bit a vigilant guard of one most appropriate and pertinent explanation first put forward by the Socialist Political party of Great Great britain in 1904.

In Marxian conception socialism and communism are synonymous. Marx and Engels accept used the 2 terms alternatively to mean the same thing – post-revolutionary participatory democratic socialist assistants of things – affairs of life – in lieu of the   capitalist administration of men. In Marx's view the principle of communism or socialism is: From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs.

⃰     See: The World Socialist Party (India) INTRODUCTION at: http://www.worldsocialistpartyindia.org/introduction.doc

Binay Sarkar is a retired college teacher from Kolkotta

Related posts:

concepciondaree1968.blogspot.com

Source: https://countercurrents.org/2019/07/road-map-to-socialism-democracy-is-the-road-to-socialism/

Share this post